Current:Home > NewsAppeals court reduces restrictions on Biden administration contact with social media platforms-LoTradeCoin
Appeals court reduces restrictions on Biden administration contact with social media platforms
View Date:2024-12-23 21:19:25
A federal appeals court Friday significantly eased a lower court's order curbing the Biden administration's communications with social media companies over controversial content about COVID-19 and other issues.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans said Friday that the White House, the Surgeon General, the Centers for Disease Control and the FBI cannot "coerce" social media platforms to take down posts the government doesn't like.
But the court tossed out broader language in an order that a Louisiana-based federal judge had issued July 4 that effectively blocked multiple government agencies from contacting platforms like Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) to urge the removal of content.
But the appeals court's softened order won't take effect immediately. The Biden administration has 10 days to seek a review by the Supreme Court.
Friday evening's ruling came in a lawsuit filed in northeast Louisiana that accused administration officials of coercing platforms to take down content under the threat of possible antitrust actions or changes to federal law shielding them from lawsuits over their users' posts.
COVID-19 vaccines, the FBI's handling of a laptop that belonged to President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and election fraud allegations were among the topics spotlighted in the lawsuit, which accused the administration of using threats of regulatory action to squelch conservative points of view.
The states of Missouri and Louisiana filed the lawsuit, along with a conservative website owner and four people opposed to the administration's COVID-19 policy.
In a posting on X, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry called Friday's ruling "a major win against censorship."
In an unsigned 75-page opinion, three 5th Circuit judges agreed with the plaintiffs that the administration "ran afoul of the First Amendment" by at times threatening social media platforms with antitrust action or changes to law protecting them from liability.
But the court excised much of U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty's broad July 4 ruling, saying mere encouragement to take down content doesn't always cross a constitutional line.
"As an initial matter, it is axiomatic that an injunction is overbroad if it enjoins a defendant from engaging in legal conduct. Nine of the preliminary injunction's ten prohibitions risk doing just that. Moreover, many of the provisions are duplicative of each other and thus unnecessary," Friday's ruling said.
The ruling also removed some agencies from the order: the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency and the State Department.
The case was heard by judges Jennifer Walker Elrod and Edith Brown Clement, nominated to the court by former President George W. Bush; and Don Willett, nominated by former President Donald Trump. Doughty was nominated to the federal bench by Trump.
- In:
- Technology
- New Orleans
- Joe Biden
- Politics
- Louisiana
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Wheel of Fortune Contestant Goes Viral Over His Hilariously Wrong Answer
- A 'Love Story' turned 'Red': Fireball releases lipstick inspired by Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce
- Wayne Kramer, late guitarist of rock band MC5, also leaves legacy of bringing music to prisons
- What is Taylor Swift's net worth?
- Solawave Black Friday Sale: Don't Miss Buy 1, Get 1 Free on Age-Defying Red Light Devices
- Dartmouth men’s basketball team will hold union vote on March 5
- On Lunar New Year, what celebrating the Vietnamese Tet holiday has taught me
- Kansas City's Patrick Mahomes is breaking another Super Bowl barrier for Black quarterbacks
- Bluesky has added 1 million users since the US election as people seek alternatives to X
- Pakistan’s ex-PM Sharif says he will seek coalition government after trailing imprisoned rival Khan
Ranking
- IAT Community Introduce
- Congressional age limit proposed in North Dakota in potential test case for nation
- Jury convicts northern Michigan man in murders of teen and woman
- Nearly 200 abused corpses were found at a funeral home. Why did it take authorities years to act?
- Does the NFL have a special teams bias when hiring head coaches? History indicates it does
- GOP organizations sue Arizona’s top election official in latest dispute over election manual
- Former St. Louis officer who shot suspect in 2018 found not guilty
- New Jersey teen sues classmate for allegedly creating, sharing fake AI nudes
Recommendation
-
After Baltimore mass shooting, neighborhood goes full year with no homicides
-
Sean Payton hasn't made 'final decision' on Russell Wilson's future, regrets bashing Jets
-
Carl Weathers' Cause Of Death Revealed
-
LA Dodgers embrace insane expectations, 'target on our back' as spring training begins
-
'Wheel of Fortune' contestant makes viral mistake: 'Treat yourself a round of sausage'
-
'Wait Wait' for February 10, 2024: With Not My Job guest Lena Waithe
-
Why Jesse Palmer Calls Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift’s Romance a Total Win
-
A 'Love Story' turned 'Red': Fireball releases lipstick inspired by Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce